Be the API
agents get right.
Equip coding agents like Claude Code and Cursor to one-shot complex integrations against your API, handle API version updates, and migrate users from competitors.
We generate agent plugins for your API, manage upkeep, and guide submission to the Claude and OpenAI marketplaces. Free for six months.
A working API call is not a production-ready integration.Read why frontier models write API integration code that fails at runtime 25% of the time, and how our context plugins close the gap.Read the blogWhat you get
Context Plugins for Your API
Agent plugins for tools like Claude Code and Codex, generated from your OpenAPI spec. Maintained and updated automatically for six months to keep pace with changes to your API.
Claude and OpenAI Marketplace Distribution
Listing support for the official Anthropic and OpenAI marketplace. Open a direct developer acquisition channel without committing internal product/engineering cycles.
Competitive Readiness Benchmark
An empirical evaluation measuring how coding agents integrate your API vs. your top competitor. Includes key metrics like token consumption, multi-model performance across frontier LLMs, and runtime error rates.
What we need
An OpenAPI Spec
An OpenAPI 3.x document that serves as the single source of truth from which we generate your plugins.
A Committed Launch Timeline
A technical stakeholder who can test the plugins, join weekly or bi-weekly syncs, and approve submission to official directories within 30 days from kickoff without approval delays.
Unfiltered Developer Feedback & Usage Data
Direct access to your engineers as they build with the plugins, telling us what works and where it fails so we can refine our generation engine.
A Public Story
A named testimonial or joint case study once your plugin goes live.
Before you apply.
Is it really free? What's the catch?
It is completely free for six months, and the plugin remains yours under an MIT license no matter what happens after that. To put that in perspective, the exact same build at our published rate is $1,500 a month for five languages. Our catch is that we are trading revenue for the one thing we can't buy: developers stress-testing a real, published API and telling us exactly where our system breaks so we can improve it.
We already ship an MCP server. Why do we need this?
They do different jobs. An MCP server allows an agent to call your API at runtime. A Context Plugin is designed for the agent writing the integration in the first place. That code generation happens once, before anything ever connects, and it produces the code your customer will maintain for years. In our test runs, an API with a documentation MCP averaged a score of 77. The plugin scored 96. You should run both.
We generate our own SDKs. Does this replace them?
Only if you want it to. Our plugin is generated alongside a set of SDKs, so currently we can't point the agent at packages you already publish. Your existing pipeline keeps running without interruption, and it is entirely your call whether you promote our SDKs or stick with your own. If bringing your own SDK is a dealbreaker, mention it on our call and we will give you a straight answer on whether that capability is coming.
Who maintains it after the six months?
For the first six months we regenerate it every time your spec moves, and we fix any broken SDKs. After the pilot ends you can keep us on at the discounted founding rate, or simply bring it in-house. Because it rebuilds directly from your spec and carries an MIT license, you are never locked into us. The one thing we absolutely won't do is walk away and leave a stale, broken plugin published under your brand's name.
What if it doesn't work on our API?
You keep the plugin, you keep the SDKs, and we still publish the results. We want to publish real-world data, not just the runs that made us look good. Frankly, an API already scoring in the nineties with AI agents has less to gain from this than one scoring in the seventies. Evaluating that baseline is exactly what our first call is for.